From today's Wall Street Journal, an editorial by Dr. Paul Peterson, professor of government at Harvard University and director of its Program on Education Policy and Governance, and Matthew Chingos, a research fellow at the Program:
In effect, a competition was run among the three types of management -- for-profit, nonprofit, and government-run. Four years into the race, here are the results: Students at schools managed by for-profit firms were roughly six months ahead in math than would be expected had the schools remained in the hands of the school district. In reading, students in schools managed by for-profit firms were two months further along than they would have been if the schools had been under district control, though that difference was not large enough to give us statistical certainty. Meanwhile the nonprofits -- and the school district's own reorganized schools -- did no better than expected.
Our findings are based upon information gleaned from nearly 400,000 student test scores made available to us by the School District of Philadelphia. They gave us the test scores of every tested student for the years 2001 through 2006, allowing us to track student performance at for-profit, nonprofit and low-performing district schools both before and after the management changes took place.
...Though we believe our methodology to be state of the art, our findings will nonetheless be controversial, because they contradict a prior study by the RAND Corp. in February, which found no impact of private management on student performance. The RAND study, however, failed to separate out the schools managed by the for-profit firms from those managed by the nonprofit organizations. In our study, too, management effects are nil when the two are mixed together, as the positive impacts of for-profit firms are canceled out by the negative impacts of nonprofit organizations.
Even Adam Smith would not expect that for-profit management will work anytime, and anywhere. But the Philadelphia results demonstrate that putting schools in private hands could lead to improvements in education. At the very least, the current Philadelphia for-profit schools should be allowed to continue under private management. If results from the first four years continue to hold up, they make a strong case for giving the private sector a larger role in urban education
This issue will continue to unfold. Any thoughts?
07 November 2007
17 October 2007
American Cancer Society’s Cattle Baron’s Ball
Clay Gibbons is Co-Chair of this year’s Cattle Baron’s Ball and invites everyone to come out and help “Stomp Out Cancer”.
The event is on November 9th at Rembert Farm in Alachua. Check out www.gainesvillecattlebaronsball.com for more information or contact clay at 352-372-2534x116
The event is on November 9th at Rembert Farm in Alachua. Check out www.gainesvillecattlebaronsball.com for more information or contact clay at 352-372-2534x116
Congratulations Anne Kress!
Check out the article in the Alligator about Anne: http://www.alligator.org/
Congratulations on your new position Anne!
10 October 2007
Education Session
Yesterday's session was very thought-provoking. If you'd like to continue the discussion about possible remedies to some of the problems in our educational system, please do so below.
Junior Achievement Breakfast
On October 25th Junior Achievement will have its annual breakfast meeting. If anyone would like to attend they should contact Bryan Harrington.
For more information on JA, its goals, and the breakfast meeting, visit the Junior Achievement website.
For more information on JA, its goals, and the breakfast meeting, visit the Junior Achievement website.
04 October 2007
Education Shadows
17 September 2007
Social Services Day
27 August 2007
SimSoc
17 August 2007
Welcome LG 34!
This is the blog for Leadership Gainesville Class 34. We are looking forward to another great year and hope that this will be a helpful source of information as we proceed.
15 August 2007
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)










